What is Clinical Enrollment’s site philosophy?
We understand how busy and often overworked clinical sites are, and how deeply you care about providing the best possible medical care for each patient. At Clinical Enrollment, our philosophy is simple: one perfect patient is better than 100 referrals. We do not aim to overwhelm sites with quantity. We aim to be hyper-specific with quality, matching patients to exact screening dates through a rigorous triple-screening process—online, phone, and medical record retrieval. At the end of the day, we understand these are human beings with health conditions exploring experimental medicine to find hope. We treat them like human beings, not numbers. For our site partners, the best service we can provide is one highly qualified, highly convicted patient every single time.
What is “Patient Conviction” and why does it matter?
Simply being qualified for a study is only half the battle. Qualification is the necessary first step, but patients must also want to participate. Patient conviction can be very fickle. These individuals are making significant medical decisions and need to feel momentum, to feel seen, and to feel heard. This is why immediate outreach—like our warm transfers and scheduled calls—yields drastically better connection and enrollment statistics. When we or our site partners reach out within the first 24 hours, patients feel like they are in the process. They feel taken care of, they know the next steps, and their conviction solidifies.
What makes a great clinical site to partner with?
A great clinical site understands that trial participants are patients making vulnerable medical decisions who need to be nurtured. They are excellent communicators with both the Sponsor and Clinical Enrollment. They transparently inform us how many patients they can realistically screen in a month, they know their screening windows, and they account for trial variability. Most importantly, they spend time and are considerate with each patient. They make the extra phone call to check in. These small, sometimes unscalable activities separate great sites from good ones. The goal for any site is to successfully enroll a handful of patients, not process 50 leads—and those small, non-scalable acts of care are what ensure that actually occurs.
Why do we choose to pull EHRs in 3 days?
Traditionally, taking up to a month to pull and review medical records slows down the entire enrollment process. Tracking down these extended records is incredibly burdensome for sites and destroys patient momentum. Clinical Enrollment takes that responsibility on ourselves to accelerate speed. We ensure that you can communicate with the patient with a full clinical picture within 3 to 5 days. We want sites to be able to call patients right away, fully informed, rather than waiting weeks or a month to gather the necessary medical history.
How does the “Mother Goose” protocol work?
It is our proprietary patient-nurturing step. Between the initial screening and the site introduction, we act as a guide. We educate the patient on the realities of clinical trials, answer their preliminary fears, and set concrete expectations. This hand-holding ensures that when they finally speak with your site, they aren’t just curious—they are prepared, informed, and ready to consent.
What is the recommended cadence if a patient misses the initial call?
While speed-to-lead is critical, we recognize life happens. If a patient misses the initial connection, we recommend a secondary outreach within 24 hours, followed by a final touchpoint at 72 hours, leaving empathetic, clear voicemails each time. If they remain unreachable, sites should transparently communicate this back to Clinical Enrollment so we can re-engage them through our Mother Goose protocol rather than burning site resources.